:: rawblogXport ::

:: Friday, May 28, 2004 ::

Local 872 has some explaining to do, and the feds are listening closely By John L. Smith, Las Vegas Review-Journal
The complaint would be bad enough had Local 872 had a pristine history, but the 2003 election was its first in several years due to previous questions of leadership impropriety. It had operated under the supervision of the international. Previous union officials have run afoul of the rules, and Martin, who admits he backed unsuccessful challengers in the 2003 election, isn't afraid to take shots at the local's hierarchy.

He alleges, 'Members were never asked what kind of election they wanted, whether walk-in or mail-in ballots.' The eight-year union member says hundreds of ballots from that election are unaccounted for in the 3,000-member local.

Local 872 isn't the largest in the country, but its location and recent history make it among LIUNA's most visible offices. It's obvious from the interest of the Department of Labor and U.S. attorney that a lot of people are watching and don't like what they see.

The union has two choices: Fight the government in court, or pitch the elections and start over. It might be cheaper in the long run -- and an enhancement to its shaky credibility -- if it began anew.

Who knows, some day Local 872 will set a standard for free and fair elections.

Hey, brother, democracy begins at home.

posted 6:35 AM :: reference link :: 0 comments ::

-------------------------------------------