:: rawblogXport ::
union news / workers rights / construction / safety / irony...
 |
|||||||
| carpentersunionbc.com | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google news | |||||||
recent posts: | |||||||
| BlogRolling: | |||||||
blogs that link here  
    
  implementation: email d@ve2300 this weblog is the work of dave livingston, a union carpenter in nelson bc canada 
|
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of labor and economic issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 Chapter 1 Sec.107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. | ||||||
 | |||||||
|
"The fight is never about grapes or lettuce. It is always about people." Cesar Chavez |
:: Saturday, October 21, 2006 ::
Study reveals who is more likely to receive job-related training - By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CanWest News Service via Vancouver Sun
Meanwhile, the study found being a member of a union was not necessarily a factor that determined whether or not a worker would engage in job-related training.
However, said study author Cathy Underhill, it did increase the likelihood of getting employer support for those wanting to receive further training.
For union members, the likelihood of receiving employer support for training was 3.8 times higher than for non-union members, the study found. "Often times you'll find that a union will lobby on behalf of its members to have training supported by their employer,'' noted Underhill. Support can include things like paying for training, flexible hours or offering transportation to training.
But the union's presence was not a ``predictor'' of actually receiving the training, Underhill said.------------------------------------------- posted 9:37 AM :: reference link ::
0 comments ::
Comments:
Post a Comment
