:: rawblogXport ::
union news / workers rights / construction / safety / irony...
 |
|||||||
| carpentersunionbc.com | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google news | |||||||
recent posts: | |||||||
| BlogRolling: | |||||||
blogs that link here  
    
  implementation: email d@ve2300 this weblog is the work of dave livingston, a union carpenter in nelson bc canada 
|
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of labor and economic issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 Chapter 1 Sec.107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. | ||||||
 | |||||||
|
"The fight is never about grapes or lettuce. It is always about people." Cesar Chavez |
:: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 ::
How Credible is Coca-Cola? Posted by Anonymous, phxnews
Coke’s overall record on safety, as monitored by OSHA, is both less than admirable and worse than many of its competitors (such as Pepsi). In an article headlined “OSHA Cites Coke for 222 Violations,” the Atlanta Business Chronicle (4/14/03) provided details. For example, in 2002 “The Coca-Cola Co. and its network of bottlers were cited for 222 violations of federal OSHA standards and fined $156,831. In 2001, OSHA cited Coke and its bottlers for 212 violations and fined them a total of $170,091. Over the past decade, the companies have been cited for 2,264 violations.” In February 2003, OSHA identified 14,200 U.S. facilities (workplaces) that had accident and illness rates at twice the national average of about three illnesses or injuries for every 100 workers. Ninety-six of these workplaces were owned by Coke bottlers. (To read the entire article, go to http://www.bizjournals.com.)------------------------------------------- posted 5:20 AM :: reference link ::
0 comments ::
Comments:
Post a Comment
