:: rawblogXport ::union news / workers rights / construction / safety / irony... | |
today's home page ![]() | |
![]() |
|
carpentersunionbc.com | |
---|---|
google news | |
recent posts: | |
BlogRolling: | |
blogs that link here ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() implementation: email d@ve2300 this weblog is the work of dave livingston, a union carpenter in nelson bc canada ![]() | |
| |
| |
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of labor and economic issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 Chapter 1 Sec.107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. | |
![]() | |
"The fight is never about grapes or lettuce. It is always about people." Cesar Chavez | |
:: Thursday, August 05, 2004 ::
Union rules at issue in Sea-Tac lawsuit Deirdre Gregg, Puget Sound Business Journal
Should a small coffee kiosk be allowed to operate at Sea-Tac Airport if its 10 employees aren't union members?
This question is at the heart of a new lawsuit filed by coffee purveyor Flying Eagle Espresso Inc. against the Port of Seattle, its prime concession contractor and a large service workers union. The case, filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, raises thorny issues about union-membership requirements long opposed by local business interests. And it comes at a time when unions, confronted by a shrinking manufacturing sector, have moved aggressively (and successfully) to court service-sector employees throughout the state.
In an action that alleges violations of antitrust, labor and consumer-protection laws, Flying Eagle claims that the structure of labor arrangements at the airport "unreasonably restrains trade and is contrary to the law."------------------------------------------- posted 6:39 AM :: reference link ::
0 comments ::